BuzzASR
100+ monolingual speech recognizers, one per language¶
We fine-tune Whisper-large-v3 into a separate model for each of 102 FLEURS languages, with two recipes: plain fine-tuning (SFT) and full fine-tuning with a native tokenizer (FFT). This site is a short technical overview of the project: the two recipes, why the tokenizer matters, and what the models achieve.
Read the paper (arXiv) · Get the models (Hugging Face) · Code
How to read the SOTA counts
"Lowest CER among open systems" means the best of SFT or FFT (picked per language on validation, never on test) beats Omni-1B/7B, MMS-1B, Qwen3-ASR, and Cohere on CER. We report it on FLEURS-test (31) and on the combined FLEURS + CommonVoice set (41).
The two recipes¶
FFT's advantage comes from its tokenizer. Whisper's tokenizer was built for English-heavy data, so it splits other languages into many small pieces. FFT trains a native tokenizer that keeps whole morphemes. That one change makes FFT more accurate, and it also makes decoding faster.
Where to start¶
-
Technical overview
What BuzzASR is, and how the two recipes (SFT and FFT) differ.
-
The tokenizer
Why a native tokenizer helps, and a bug worth knowing about.
-
Results
How accurate the models are, and why FFT decodes faster.
-
Models
All 102 per-language weights are live on Hugging Face under the BuzzASR org.
All 102 models are available now on Hugging Face under the BuzzASR organization — one model per language. See Models.
Acknowledgments¶
Developed in collaboration with EleutherAI, whose compute and support made these training runs possible.
Citation¶
Paper: arXiv:2609.09554 · Findings of EMNLP 2026.
@misc{buzzasr2026,
title = {BuzzASR: A Swarm of 100+ Monolingual Speech Recognition Models},
author = {Shivam Singh and Aditya Yadavalli and Catherine Arnett and Alex Warstadt},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2609.09554},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.CL},
note = {Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09554}
}